Question
1 - What are your
views on whether there is a prevalence in the use of supply
teachers on a planned and unplanned basis?
|
I am employed in
both cases, planned being when a regular class teacher is attending
a course and unplanned being when a teacher is unwell. I
would say that I work both cases equally however in the case of an
unplanned absence I am more likely to cover for up to a term at a
time whereas I cover for courses usually on a one day
basis.
|
If you believe that this results in problems
(for example, for schools, pupils or teachers), how do you think
they could be resolved?
|
Often when a teacher is unwell no planned work
is left and a supply teacher has to use whatever resources are
available to them. I then worry that, when I am teaching
“off plan” the children are not covering the necessary
topics/ skills that their regular teacher would teach them.
It would be useful for Head teachers to be vigilant about
ensuring that weekly plans are displayed in the classroom and that
the plans are detailed and clear for a supply teacher to follow, or
that sufficient support is given eg. PPA time for a supply
teacher/ copies of long or medium term plans etc. especially if
they are covering for a prolonged absence (3 days or
more).
|
How significant is this issue? (Please select
one option)
|
1 – This is a key, urgent
problem.
|
§
|
2 – This is a problem that
needs to be addressed.
|
§
x
|
§
3 – This is a minor
problem
|
§
|
4 – Not a problem.
|
§
|
Question 2
- What are your
views on the circumstances in which supply teachers are used for
example, the types of classes they cover; the types of learning
activities which take place under the supervision of supply
teachers; whether they are qualified to teach relevant
subjects?
|
As a primary
supply teacher I believe that I cover the same topics and have
equal qualification as many of the regular class teachers. However,
I am aware of very different circumstances in Secondary school,
where unqualified members of staff or supply teachers are employed
as ‘cover supervisors’. It is my opinion that
this role should not exist. It does not benefit the pupils,
as the cover supervisor is often not an expert in the subject and
it does not benefit the employee as they cannot count this type of
teaching towards their NQT induction and are paid less than a
regular teacher.
|
If you believe there are problems in this area,
how do you think they could be resolved?
|
I believe this could be solved by the
eradication of the cover supervisor role and instead qualified
supply Teachers should be used. There seems to be a view that if
you have not planned/ designed the work yourself then you can be
employed as a cover supervisor, however the deliverance of these
plans require teaching skills and should be acknowledged as
teaching rather than ‘supervising’.
|
How significant is this issue? (Please select
one option)
|
1 – This is a key, urgent
problem.
|
§
|
2 – This is a problem that
needs to be addressed.
|
§
x
|
§
3 – This is a minor
problem
|
§
|
4 – Not a problem.
|
§
|
Question 4
- What are your
views on the Continuous Professional Development of supply teachers
and the potential impact of the National Professional Learning
Model?
|
|
It is my opinion
that the CPD of supply teachers is poor. Supply teachers are
reluctant to attend courses where they may be sacrificing a
day’s pay and therefore often end up attending courses in
holiday time. The provision of courses run by agencies varies
hugely and supply teachers have to pay to attend. I have paid
over £100 pounds to attend CPD courses when other NQTs, who
are paid a far higher wage, are being funded by the
school/council/government.
I also believe
that supply teachers are hugely disadvantaged by the NQT induction
as it stands. The standards that we are expected to attain
are the same as a regular teacher, such as regularly assessing
pupil progress and meeting with parents. This is difficult
when many supply teachers are employed for one or two days at a
time in different schools with different classes.
Observations by their mentors may take place with classes
that the supply teacher hardly knows.
|
|
If you believe there are problems in this area,
how do you think they could be resolved?
|
|
-
Supply teachers to be enrolled in
any teaching courses run by the local council (this is not the case
in the council that I work under) and/or supply agencies to be
legally obliged to provide regular, free CPD courses.
-
Induction standards to be adjusted
to acknowledge the situation of a supply teacher.
-
Schools to be thoroughly informed
and supportive of the Induction process supply teachers must
achieve and offer supply teachers, especially regular supply, any
CPD opportunities that regular teachers are afforded eg.
Twilight sessions, Inset days, observed lessons by senior
leadership team with feedback.
-
How the school treats supply
teachers to be investigated during an ESTYN inspection.
|
|
How significant is this issue? (Please select
one option)
|
|
1 – This is a key, urgent
problem.
|
§
x
|
|
2 – This is a problem that
needs to be addressed.
|
§
|
|
§
3 – This is a minor
problem
|
§
|
|
4 – Not a problem.
|
|
|
Question 5
- What are your
views on performance management arrangements for supply
teachers?
|
|
I have not been
involved in any performance management through schools
(observations, evidence files, target setting
etc.)
|
|
If you think there are problems in this area,
how do you think they could be resolved?
|
|
Regular supplies to be involved in the
performance management strategies employed by their regular school,
especially if they are to be observed by ESTYN.
|
|
How significant is this issue? (Please select
one option)
|
|
1 – This is a key, urgent
problem.
|
§
|
|
2 – This is a problem that
needs to be addressed.
|
§
x
|
|
§
3 – This is a minor
problem
|
§
|
|
4 – Not a problem.
|
§
|
|
Question 6
- Do you consider
that local authorities and regional consortia have sufficient
oversight of the use of supply teachers?
|
|
No, supply
agencies have monopolised the supply agency market as they search
for work for supply teachers, whereas the council works as a means
of payment rather than as an agency.
|
|
If you believe there are problems in this area,
how do you think they could be resolved?
|
|
Either:
-
Supply agencies to pay supply
teachers the same wage as they would be paid through the council,
as currently the agencies take a significant cut of our wages.
In my case my school pays the agency £180 a day and I
receive £70 pounds of that (after tax).
Or (more preferably)
-
Schools to employ supply teachers
directly and be paid through the local council. Supply
teachers jobs could be advertised by the school and once awarded,
one or more supply teachers would work exclusively for that school,
covering all their supply work.
Or:
-
A more active role taken by
all councils (as some already do) to run government funded
agencies by the local authority (eradicating private agencies)
where they do not take a cut of a supply teacher’s
wage.
|
|
How significant is this issue? (Please select
one option)
|
|
1 – This is a key, urgent
problem.
|
§
x
|
|
2 – This is a problem that
needs to be addressed.
|
§
|
|
§
3 – This is a minor
problem
|
§
|
|
4 – Not a problem.
|
§
|
|
Question 7
- Are you aware of
any local and regional variation in the use of supply teachers and
if so, are there any reasons for this?
|
|
Yes, some councils
play a far more active part in supply teaching, creating a supply
teaching ‘pool’. I am aware that Carmarthenshire
council do this. I am unaware of why this is the case in some
counties and not in others.
|
|
If you believe there are problems in this area,
how do you think they could be resolved?
|
|
-
Remove private supply
agencies
-
Councils to play a more active part
in employing supply teachers eg. Forming their own local
authority supply agency where they actively find supply teachers
work.
|
|
How significant is this issue? (Please select
one option)
|
|
1 – This is a key, urgent
problem.
|
§
|
|
2 – This is a problem that
needs to be addressed.
|
§
x
|
|
§
3 – This is a minor
problem
|
§
|
|
4 – Not a problem.
|
§
|
|
Question 8
- Do you have any
views on supply agencies and their quality assurance
arrangements?
|
|
-
Supply
agencies take a significant portion of a supply teacher’s
wage. My school pays my agency £180 pounds for a
day’s work and I receive £70 of this.
-
The
interview process is more of a formality than of a rigorous
interview you would receive for a teaching post.
-
Supply
agencies often pay teachers through an umbrella company, who also
take part of your wage through a processing fee. They often
hold your holiday pay unless you specifically ask for it and there
is a tight deadline for when you can apply for your holiday
pay.
-
Supply
agencies have often pressurised me into taking work which is miles
away from where I live or in which I am inexperienced eg. SEN
units and nurseries or asking me to work in a class/ school in
which the behaviour of the pupils is challenging and, as an NQT, I
am inexperienced with. They are often not upfront about the
fact that these classes are challenging as they do not wish you to
turn down a day which they financially benefit from.
|
|
If you believe there are problems in this area,
how do you think they could be resolved?
|
|
-
A fixed and consistent wage paid for
any supply work undertaken.
-
Supply work offered to be carefully
matched to a supply teacher’s qualifications, experience and
location.
-
To be paid directly rather than
through umbrella companies.
-
Holiday pay to be included in any
work the supply teacher undertakes (as law).
-
A pension payment plan consistent
with teacher’s payment plans who work through the council (as
law).
|
|
How significant is this issue? (Please select
one option)
|
|
1 – This is a key, urgent
problem.
|
§
X
|
|
2 – This is a problem that
needs to be addressed.
|
§
|
|
§
3 – This is a minor
problem
|
§
|
|
4 – Not a problem.
|
§
|
|
Question 9
- Are you aware of
any specific issues relating to Welsh medium education? If so, what
are they?
|
|
N/A
|
|
If you believe there are problems in this area,
how do you think they could be resolved?
|
|
N/A
|
|
How significant is this issue? (Please select
one option)
|
|
1 – This
is a key, urgent problem.
|
§
|
|
2 – This is a problem that
needs to be addressed.
|
§
|
|
§
3 – This is a minor
problem
|
§
|
|
4 – Not a problem.
|
§
|
|
Question
10 - If you had to
make one recommendation to the Welsh Government from all the points
you have made, what would that recommendation be?
|
That schools directly employ one or more
exclusive supply teachers who they pay through the council and who
are afforded all of the CPD opportunities that their regular
teachers are given.
|
Question
11 - Do you have any
other comments or issues you wish to raise that have not been
covered by the specific questions?
|
|